(LDS6) First CAWSES Campaign Results (Final Report)
Conveners:
Janet Kozyra (jukozyra@srvr5.engin.umich.edu),
Jan Sojka (fasojka@gaim.cass.usu.edu),
Marty Mlynczak (m.g.mlynczak@nasa.gov)
2004 Tuesday 29 June 0100-0300 PM
WORKSHOP PURPOSE
The purpose of the workshop was to:
- take a first look at ITM observations during the
space weather (25 March - 6 April 2004) and atmospheric coupling (March - April 2004)
portions of the First CAWSES campaign
- provide a forum for initiating and developing collaborations
- collect science issues on which to focus campaign efforts
within the international science community in the coming year
The speakers were asked
to focus on interesting features in the data and the new science questions they raise.
BACKGROUND ON THE CAWSES CAMPAIGN
The CAWSES campaign was run
in association with the CPEA (Coupling Processes in the Equatorial Atmosphere)
campaign (April/May 2004) and the ISR World Days campaign (March 29 - April 3, 2004).
The focus of the ISR World Days campaign is the coupling between the high- and low-latitude
ionospheres. The focus of the CPEA campaign is the coupling from the troposphere
up through the thermosphere in a strong convective region over Indonesia. During the ISR
World Days, CAWSES functioned to draw together and expand these efforts by coordinating
more than 40 collaborating programs (including 20 satellites, all ISR radars, SuperDARN,
GPS TEC, and a wide range of ground-based observations listed at
http://www.bu.edu/cawses/)
to produce a sun-to-Earth data set which dips down into the
lower atmosphere. Another focus is on functioning as a testbed for producing new
integrated global maps of important geophysical quantities, including: ULF wave parameters
for radiation belt studies, higher-resolution GPS TEC maps, and others to be determined.
During the CPEA campaign, CAWSES efforts focus on characterizing equinox conditions
in the middle atmosphere which also serves as global context for the equatorial
atmospheric coupling campaign. An effort will be underway to construct global maps of middle
atmosphere quantities (i.e., mesospheric winds extended globally with basis functions,
others, etc) where possible.
DESCRIPTION OF SOLAR WIND DRIVERS AND RESULTING ACTIVITY
Magnetic activity during this interval includes a high speed stream with recurrent
substorm activity and a 2-day extremely quiet interval followed by two moderate magnetic
storms --- the first on April 3 due to a slow CME released on March 31, the second triggered
by the leading edge of a high-speed stream. The radiation belts were enhanced throughout
much of this interval.
The solar wind drivers during the atmospheric coupling campaign changed dramatically
between the months of March and April 2004. Powerful high-speed streams from deep
within coronal holes dominated in March. These switched to rather weak high speed
streams in April emanating from the edges of coronal holes. Surprisingly enough, the
hemispheric power input during these two months indicated that these two types of
structures were comparable in geoeffectiveness.
WORKSHOP SUMMARY
Selected early science results reported during the CAWSES workshop include:
- Highest levels of odd nitrogen ever seen during entire UARS mission (1994-2004)
and corresponding decrease in stratospheric ozone [Jim Russell, Marty Mlynczak]
- Question: Is this due to natural variability or is it related to superstorms in late
Oct/Nov 2003 coupled with a stable vortex?
- Clear correlations between elevated NOx and vortex position suggesting
vertical descent is a factor. May be first example from UARS of descent
deep into the stratosphere
- Attempts planned to verify and track descent of NOx enhancement using
TIMED and UARS - other data sets??
- Plans to run the WACCM-1 atmosphere model with particle inputs from
Oct/Nov 2003 superstorms
- Unusual positive storm effects, storm enhanced density (SED) plume and strong
subauroral polarization (SAPs) electric field seen at Millstone Hill. [Chaosong Huang,
John Foster].
- First science runs of GAIM, an ionospheric data assimilation model [Jan Sojka]
- Equivalent to 3D global map of the ionosphere
- Based on ionosondes and TEC with underlying physics-based model
- Ionospheric Bubbles and Unusual Wave Structures in the Aurora [Larry Paxton]
- Undulating auroras containing structured proton precipitation were
observed during both the April 3 and April 5 storms
- Unusual occurrence in the TIMED/GUVI data
- Are these related through the global electrodynamics to the trigger for
equatorial bubbles occurring near the same time on these days?
- Convection Features: Extremely quiet SuperDARN convection patterns on April 1
and 2. 115 kV peak polar cap potential drop during storm on April 3. Large
swings in IMF By. SAPs fields on April 3 seen around 14 UT. [Mike Ruhoniemi]
- Mid-to-low latitude electrodynamics [Dave Anderson]
- Observed prompt penetration electric fields
- Attempts will be made to follow development for the 1st time from the
extremely quiet April 2 interval to active conditions
- New Insights into coupling to low altitudes [Larissa Goncharenko]
- New evidence that SAPs electric fields penetrate to low altitudes (down to
150 km) and produce ion and neutral heating
- Clear wave signatures in Ti - propagating from below - seen as high as 160 km
- Traveling ionospheric disturbances at 1800 UT on day 097 (April 5) seen on 4
consecutive orbits from the CHAMP satellite [Eric Sutton, Jeff Forbes]
- Large enhancement in the 2-day wave and diurnal tide - other interesting activity
during same time period [Scott Palo]
- FPI Meridional winds over Sondrestrom are reduced in March 2004 over those from
2002-2003 in same season [Rick Niciejewski ].
FUTURE PLANS
A summary of these results was presented at the CAWSES organizational meeting in
Paris on July 17, 2004. Plans are being formulated to begin an international analysis
effort, run largely over the internet with workshops at major internationl and national
meetings where possible. The CAWSES website at Boston University will maintain links
to sites serving data and distribute information coordinating the international analysis
efforts. To be most effective, this analysis effort must rely heavily on national CAWSES
programs (already established in Germany, India, China, and Japan; others to follow) as
well as national programs like CEDAR covering similar science areas. It is hoped that the
CEDAR community can take a lead in the US efforts involving the ITM science by
sponsoring a series of CAWSES/CEDAR workshops focused on science issues and by coordinating
the US contribution to integrated global maps of important geophysical parameters.
With leadership, these integrated global maps will develop into innovative analysis tools
(shared by the international community) to address open science questions in ways that
have not been possible before. They will also create an important new capability and
establish a user community in the years leading up to the I*Y 2007 programs (eGY, IPY,
IHY, etc.).